Difference between revisions of "Operating Committee Meeting 13/08/19"

From ipswichmakerspace
Jump to: navigation, search
(Replaced content with " == Agenda == * Next working party (JL) * Policy for new equipment and loans == Notes == category:meeting")
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
== Agenda ==
 
== Agenda ==
  
* Next working party (JL)
+
 
 
* Policy for new equipment and loans
 
* Policy for new equipment and loans
 +
** Maintenance and liability. Issue a receipt for equipment loans?
 +
** How to identify 'dangerous' equipment ''empirically'', and what are the Risk Assessment requirements for such?
 +
** Especially what rules are required for 'visiting' equipment vs long-term loaning/new? Is a generic RA possible?
 +
 +
* What current equipment meets the above 'dangerous' standard and who is going to assess it?
 +
** This list is also needed as a comparative guide to further help define 'dangerous'
 +
 +
 +
* Workshop sander area needs dust extraction setting up
 +
* Workshop 'pipe fan' needs investigation, what did Sheep leave in there and can we use it?
 +
 +
 +
 +
* Next working party (JL) ''moved down as some of the above may feature in it, so discussion should be had first''
  
 
== Notes ==
 
== Notes ==

Revision as of 10:17, 9 August 2019

Agenda

  • Policy for new equipment and loans
    • Maintenance and liability. Issue a receipt for equipment loans?
    • How to identify 'dangerous' equipment empirically, and what are the Risk Assessment requirements for such?
    • Especially what rules are required for 'visiting' equipment vs long-term loaning/new? Is a generic RA possible?
  • What current equipment meets the above 'dangerous' standard and who is going to assess it?
    • This list is also needed as a comparative guide to further help define 'dangerous'


  • Workshop sander area needs dust extraction setting up
  • Workshop 'pipe fan' needs investigation, what did Sheep leave in there and can we use it?


  • Next working party (JL) moved down as some of the above may feature in it, so discussion should be had first

Notes